<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:37:27 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Everything Hertz - Episodes Tagged with “Meta Analysis”</title>
    <link>https://everythinghertz.fireside.fm/tags/meta-analysis</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 18:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <description>Methodology, scientific life, and bad language. Co-hosted by Dr. Dan Quintana (University of Oslo) and Dr. James Heathers (Cipher Skin)
</description>
    <language>en-au</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Methodology, scientific life, and bad language. </itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Dan Quintana</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Methodology, scientific life, and bad language. Co-hosted by Dr. Dan Quintana (University of Oslo) and Dr. James Heathers (Cipher Skin)
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/f/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/cover.jpg?v=2"/>
    <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, science, research, academia </itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Dan Quintana</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>everythinghertzpodcast@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Health &amp; Fitness">
  <itunes:category text="Medicine"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Science"/>
<item>
  <title>4: Meta-analysis or mega-silliness?</title>
  <link>http://everythinghertz.fireside.fm/4</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/254274717</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 18:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
  <author>Dan Quintana</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/8a197422-44a1-4d71-885b-9a5e5626381c.mp3" length="28642281" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Dan Quintana</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved. </itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>39:46</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/f/f2525866-b6ef-4da9-9f4b-49fa83c8597c/cover.jpg?v=2"/>
  <description>Meta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it's not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it "an exercise in mega-silliness" in 1978,  to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a "profound moral failing" (he's half-serious) in 2016.
In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved. 
Links:
PRISMA statement - http://www.prisma-statement.org/
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>meta-analysis, psychology, research, academia</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Meta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it&#39;s not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it &quot;an exercise in mega-silliness&quot; in 1978,  to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a &quot;profound moral failing&quot; (he&#39;s half-serious) in 2016.</p>

<p>In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved. </p>

<p>Links:</p>

<p>PRISMA statement - <a href="http://www.prisma-statement.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.prisma-statement.org/</a></p>

<p>Facebook - <a href="https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/" rel="nofollow">https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/</a></p>

<p>Twitter - <a href="https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast" rel="nofollow">https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast</a></p><p><a rel="payment" href="https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast">Support Everything Hertz</a></p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Meta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it&#39;s not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it &quot;an exercise in mega-silliness&quot; in 1978,  to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a &quot;profound moral failing&quot; (he&#39;s half-serious) in 2016.</p>

<p>In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved. </p>

<p>Links:</p>

<p>PRISMA statement - <a href="http://www.prisma-statement.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.prisma-statement.org/</a></p>

<p>Facebook - <a href="https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/" rel="nofollow">https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/</a></p>

<p>Twitter - <a href="https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast" rel="nofollow">https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast</a></p><p><a rel="payment" href="https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast">Support Everything Hertz</a></p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
