web01.fireside.fm Wed, 29 Apr 2026 03:35:21 -0500 Fireside (https://fireside.fm) Everything Hertz - Episodes Tagged with “Psychology” https://everythinghertz.fireside.fm/tags/psychology Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:00:00 +0100 Methodology, scientific life, and bad language. Co-hosted by Dr. Dan Quintana (University of Oslo) and Dr. James Heathers (Cipher Skin) en-au episodic Methodology, scientific life, and bad language. Dan Quintana Methodology, scientific life, and bad language. Co-hosted by Dr. Dan Quintana (University of Oslo) and Dr. James Heathers (Cipher Skin) yes psychology, science, research, academia Dan Quintana everythinghertzpodcast@gmail.com 78: Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine) http://everythinghertz.fireside.fm/78 2fbb6ba6-d090-43af-a51c-68181ec46d5b Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:00:00 +0100 Dan Quintana full Dan Quintana We chat with Lisa DeBruine (University of Glasgow) about large-scale collaborative science and how her psychology department made the switch from SPSS to R 58:38 yes In this episde, we chat with Lisa DeBruine (University of Glasgow) about her experience with large-scale collaborative science and how her psychology department made the switch from SPSS to R. Discussion points and links galore: Deborah Apthorp's tweet on having to teach SPSS (https://twitter.com/deborahapthorp/status/1092599860212068352), "because that's what students know" People who are involved with teaching R for psychology at the University of Glasgow: @Eavanmac @dalejbarr @McAleerP @clelandwoods @PatersonHelena @emilynordmann Why the #psyTeachR started teaching R for reproducible science Data wrangling vs. statistical analysis The psyTeachR website (https://psyteachr.github.io) Danielle Navarro (https://djnavarro.net), and her R text book (https://learningstatisticswithr.com) that you should read Lisa's "faux" package (https://github.com/debruine/faux) for data simulation Sometimes you can't share data, simulations are a good way around this problem "synthpop" is the name of the package (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/synthpop/vignettes/synthpop.pdf) that Dan mentioned that can simulate census data Power analysis can be hard once you go beyond the more conventional statistical tests (e.g., t-tests, ANOVAs etc...) Lisa's OSF page (https://osf.io/4i578/) Dirty code is always better than no code (but the cleaner the better) Live coding is terrifying but a useful teaching tool. Here's Dan live coding how to build a website in R (https://twitter.com/dsquintana/status/1070392412445401088), typos and all Using a Slack group for help The psychological science accelerator (https://psysciacc.org) Chris Chartier (Psych Science Accelerator Director) on Twitter (https://twitter.com/CRChartier) A few of the other (hundreds) of folks involved with the Psych Science Accelerator Director: @PsySciAcc: @CRChartier @BenCJ @JkayFlake @hmoshontz Lisa's Registered Report project (https://osf.io/f7v3n/) on face rating The challenges associated with collaborating with 100+ labs Authorship order Author contributions: CRediT taxonomy (http://dev.biologists.org/content/author-contributions) The DARPA-funding project (https://www.wired.com/story/darpa-wants-to-solve-sciences-replication-crisis-with-robots/) on using AI to determine reproducibility Interacting Minds workshop (http://interactingminds.au.dk/events/single-events/artikel/2-day-workshop-open-science-and-reproducibility/) in Denmark in March on open science and reproducibility Lisa shares what Glasgow is like Lisa has changed her mind about the importance of research metrics (h-index, impact factors etc...) Lisa thinks you should read this paper (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2515245918770963) on equivalence testing, which includes two former guests, Daniel Lakens (https://everythinghertz.com/guests/daniel-lakens), Anne Scheel (https://everythinghertz.com/guests/anne-scheel), and friend of the show Peder Isager. Here's the latest episode (https://anchor.fm/psychsococlock/episodes/Making-and-breaking-habits---Psych-Soc-OClock---Episode-4-e3327v) from Psych Soc O'Clock Other links - Dan on twitter (www.twitter.com/dsquintana) - James on twitter (www.twitter.com/jamesheathers) - Everything Hertz on twitter (www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) - Everything Hertz on Facebook (www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/) Music credits: Lee Rosevere (freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/) Support us on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast) and get bonus stuff! $1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the first tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes) Episode citation and permanent link Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, February 18) "Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JDT6F (https://osf.io/jdt6f/) Special Guest: Lisa DeBruine. statistics, psychology, research, R stats, reproducibility, science, registered reports In this episde, we chat with Lisa DeBruine (University of Glasgow) about her experience with large-scale collaborative science and how her psychology department made the switch from SPSS to R.

Discussion points and links galore:

  • Deborah Apthorp's tweet on having to teach SPSS, "because that's what students know"
  • People who are involved with teaching R for psychology at the University of Glasgow: @Eavanmac @dalejbarr @McAleerP @clelandwoods @PatersonHelena @emilynordmann
  • Why the #psyTeachR started teaching R for reproducible science
  • Data wrangling vs. statistical analysis
  • The psyTeachR website
  • Danielle Navarro, and her R text book that you should read
  • Lisa's "faux" package for data simulation
  • Sometimes you can't share data, simulations are a good way around this problem
  • "synthpop" is the name of the package that Dan mentioned that can simulate census data
  • Power analysis can be hard once you go beyond the more conventional statistical tests (e.g., t-tests, ANOVAs etc...)
  • Lisa's OSF page
  • Dirty code is always better than no code (but the cleaner the better)
  • Live coding is terrifying but a useful teaching tool. Here's Dan live coding how to build a website in R, typos and all
  • Using a Slack group for help
  • The psychological science accelerator
  • Chris Chartier (Psych Science Accelerator Director) on Twitter
  • A few of the other (hundreds) of folks involved with the Psych Science Accelerator Director: @PsySciAcc: @CRChartier @Ben_C_J @JkayFlake @hmoshontz
  • Lisa's Registered Report project on face rating
  • The challenges associated with collaborating with 100+ labs
  • Authorship order
  • Author contributions: CRediT taxonomy
  • The DARPA-funding project on using AI to determine reproducibility
  • Interacting Minds workshop in Denmark in March on open science and reproducibility
  • Lisa shares what Glasgow is like
  • Lisa has changed her mind about the importance of research metrics (h-index, impact factors etc...)
  • Lisa thinks you should read this paper on equivalence testing, which includes two former guests, Daniel Lakens, Anne Scheel, and friend of the show Peder Isager.
  • Here's the latest episode from Psych Soc O'Clock

Other links

Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)

Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!

  • $1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
  • $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the first tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)

Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, February 18) "Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JDT6F

Special Guest: Lisa DeBruine.

Support Everything Hertz

]]> In this episde, we chat with Lisa DeBruine (University of Glasgow) about her experience with large-scale collaborative science and how her psychology department made the switch from SPSS to R.

Discussion points and links galore:

  • Deborah Apthorp's tweet on having to teach SPSS, "because that's what students know"
  • People who are involved with teaching R for psychology at the University of Glasgow: @Eavanmac @dalejbarr @McAleerP @clelandwoods @PatersonHelena @emilynordmann
  • Why the #psyTeachR started teaching R for reproducible science
  • Data wrangling vs. statistical analysis
  • The psyTeachR website
  • Danielle Navarro, and her R text book that you should read
  • Lisa's "faux" package for data simulation
  • Sometimes you can't share data, simulations are a good way around this problem
  • "synthpop" is the name of the package that Dan mentioned that can simulate census data
  • Power analysis can be hard once you go beyond the more conventional statistical tests (e.g., t-tests, ANOVAs etc...)
  • Lisa's OSF page
  • Dirty code is always better than no code (but the cleaner the better)
  • Live coding is terrifying but a useful teaching tool. Here's Dan live coding how to build a website in R, typos and all
  • Using a Slack group for help
  • The psychological science accelerator
  • Chris Chartier (Psych Science Accelerator Director) on Twitter
  • A few of the other (hundreds) of folks involved with the Psych Science Accelerator Director: @PsySciAcc: @CRChartier @Ben_C_J @JkayFlake @hmoshontz
  • Lisa's Registered Report project on face rating
  • The challenges associated with collaborating with 100+ labs
  • Authorship order
  • Author contributions: CRediT taxonomy
  • The DARPA-funding project on using AI to determine reproducibility
  • Interacting Minds workshop in Denmark in March on open science and reproducibility
  • Lisa shares what Glasgow is like
  • Lisa has changed her mind about the importance of research metrics (h-index, impact factors etc...)
  • Lisa thinks you should read this paper on equivalence testing, which includes two former guests, Daniel Lakens, Anne Scheel, and friend of the show Peder Isager.
  • Here's the latest episode from Psych Soc O'Clock

Other links

Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)

Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!

  • $1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
  • $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the first tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)

Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, February 18) "Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JDT6F

Special Guest: Lisa DeBruine.

Support Everything Hertz

]]> 6: The research pipeline - getting from idea to publication http://everythinghertz.fireside.fm/6 tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/257805218 Thu, 07 Apr 2016 17:00:00 +0200 Dan Quintana full Dan Quintana In this episode, James and Dan talk about getting from research idea to publication. They also discuss the ethical approval process, getting research published, and share tips for running experiments 53:53 yes In this episode, James and Dan talk about getting from research idea to publication. They discuss the ethical approval process, getting research published, and share tips for running experiments. They also cover some of the software that they use in their own research: JASP and Papers. Links: JASP - https://jasp-stats.org Papers - http://www.papersapp.com Authorea - https://www.authorea.com Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/ Twitter account https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast research, psychology In this episode, James and Dan talk about getting from research idea to publication. They discuss the ethical approval process, getting research published, and share tips for running experiments. They also cover some of the software that they use in their own research: JASP and Papers.

Links:

JASP - https://jasp-stats.org

Papers - http://www.papersapp.com

Authorea - https://www.authorea.com

Facebook page

https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/

Twitter account

https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast

Support Everything Hertz

]]> In this episode, James and Dan talk about getting from research idea to publication. They discuss the ethical approval process, getting research published, and share tips for running experiments. They also cover some of the software that they use in their own research: JASP and Papers.

Links:

JASP - https://jasp-stats.org

Papers - http://www.papersapp.com

Authorea - https://www.authorea.com

Facebook page

https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/

Twitter account

https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast

Support Everything Hertz

]]> 4: Meta-analysis or mega-silliness? http://everythinghertz.fireside.fm/4 tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/254274717 Tue, 22 Mar 2016 18:00:00 +0100 Dan Quintana full Dan Quintana In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved. 39:46 yes Meta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it's not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it "an exercise in mega-silliness" in 1978, to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a "profound moral failing" (he's half-serious) in 2016. In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved. Links: PRISMA statement - http://www.prisma-statement.org/ Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/ Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast meta-analysis, psychology, research, academia Meta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it's not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it "an exercise in mega-silliness" in 1978, to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a "profound moral failing" (he's half-serious) in 2016.

In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved.

Links:

PRISMA statement - http://www.prisma-statement.org/

Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/

Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast

Support Everything Hertz

]]> Meta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it's not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it "an exercise in mega-silliness" in 1978, to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a "profound moral failing" (he's half-serious) in 2016.

In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved.

Links:

PRISMA statement - http://www.prisma-statement.org/

Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/

Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast

Support Everything Hertz

]]> 3: Scientific publishing http://everythinghertz.fireside.fm/3 tag:soundcloud,2010:tracks/252212072 Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:00:00 +0100 Dan Quintana full Dan Quintana Dan and James talk about Scihub and open access publishing. 49:16 yes Dan and James talk about Scihub and open access publishing. publishing, psychology, research Dan and James talk about Scihub and open access publishing.

Support Everything Hertz

]]> Dan and James talk about Scihub and open access publishing.

Support Everything Hertz

]]>